May 19, '09
Fury gripped me like a choke-hold when I heard President Obama endorse adoption during his commencement speech at Notre Dame this past week end. "Here's the federal government again supporting adoption" I thought "when I've spent the past several years lobbying federal agencies like the Children's Bureau of the Department of Health & Human Services to stop giving money to state-level agencies so they can adopt out more children some of whom these agency social workers and lawyers WRONGLY take away from their usually un-married mothers."
As much as I like President Obama I cringed as he spoke in support of adopting out more children some of whom certainly will be infants COERCIVELY removed from their mothers' custody and adopted out by CONCEALMENT (closed adoption). It was almost too much to listen to him advocating the creation of artificial families.
After pondering the matter this thought occurred to me. ABSTINENCE from having sex is what President Obama should have endorsed. There's nothing at all wrong with abstaining from sexual activity. Nor is this unrealistic. In order to not have sex DISCIPLINE is required.
Thank You,
Kathy Caudle
"Aberdeene"
Natural Mother
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
Birth Mothers Where Are You?
March 10, '09
You know I do this all the time. First I find a blog I want to reply to then second I lose the blog which makes it difficult to respond.
Regardless I wanted here to reply to the blog entitled Birth Mothers Where Are You? Such is because I want to let you and others know that as a birth/natural mother I'm here.
Please feel free to contact me if you need information for anything. Since my adoption-loss originated in 1978 I've not only learned a lot much to my deep anguish but also have volumes of information to share with others which I do when called upon.
My email is aberdeene@inbox.com if you'd like to send email. Thanks.
Kathy Caudle
Natural Mother
Salt Lake City, UT
You know I do this all the time. First I find a blog I want to reply to then second I lose the blog which makes it difficult to respond.
Regardless I wanted here to reply to the blog entitled Birth Mothers Where Are You? Such is because I want to let you and others know that as a birth/natural mother I'm here.
Please feel free to contact me if you need information for anything. Since my adoption-loss originated in 1978 I've not only learned a lot much to my deep anguish but also have volumes of information to share with others which I do when called upon.
My email is aberdeene@inbox.com if you'd like to send email. Thanks.
Kathy Caudle
Natural Mother
Salt Lake City, UT
Thursday, February 26, 2009
Childless Mothers Being "Stuck"
For childless mothers being stuck, as it's often called, the matter actually is NOT being "stuck" at all. Here's what I mean.
The who of childless mothers being stuck who speciffically are those mothers of adoption-loss who lost [a] child[ren] because their child[reb] was/were removed from their custody and adopted out away--from them--are that the lawyers and social workers along with others who in turn took custody of these mothers' children are the ones responsible for said mothers being stuck. In other words these mothers in many cases are stopped from making progress in their lives after the fact despite being assured by those who took their child[ren] they, the now child-less mother, could advance their lives accordingly.
Frequently lawyers like the one who led in my son being taken and adopted out away from me who was David McConkie and who helped "social worker" Colleen Burnham arrange my son's removal from my custody and placement and then proceeded to surveille me intrusively such that their encroachments into my personal affairs stopped me from going forward to affectuate improvements in my life other adoption practitioners also keep track of those natural mothers whose child[ren] they took/take and adopt out away from them. More specifically anyone whom ever took any given mother's child[ren] and adopted out her child[ren] away from her, which includes anyone whom the mother knows as the "facilitator" who took/takes her child[ren] and adopted out her child[ren] away from her, also can be identified as the tracker.
What happens which are some of the actions taken against these natural mothers, that result in her being stuck in her experience of her child[ren] being taken from her and adopted out away from her, number various tracking methods. Among these are wrongly using her identification numbers--driver's license, state ID card, date of birth information, Social Security number and those for military purposes as well as state entitlement account numbers--which could deprive the natural mother of opportunities. Education, housing, credit and employment denials constitute the deprivation such mothers could suffer because their identification numbers are used to defraud them. For some such mothers these unfavorable records against her can persist for years.
On my Experian/TRW credit report David McConkie falsified my education information by which he gave the appearance of me having defaulted on student loans, and also forged my work history on my Social Security records and so made me look like a fraudster. Then this corrupt lawyer circulated these counterfeits pretending he was part of efforts criminally investigating me.
Worsening this is that this same crooked lawyer wrongly used this forged information to steal keys to my residences and then trespassed them again pretending he and others were investigating me. As bad as this was it got even worse.
When any given adoption-related childless mother is mired down (stuck) in the ordeal of her
child[ren] being taken from her INvoluntarily and adopted out away from her, if in fact her situation hence is perverted thus, usually starts not long after she loses her child[ren]. In my case this oppressiveness was begun the first year during which my son was wrongly classified a "boarder-baby" and while the supposed adoption proceedings were being conducted in court. Other such mothers also may have similar testimony relative to their adoption-related losses.
Since identifying numbers are used to track natural mothers and make them "stuck" in their wrongful adopted-related situation this molestation can occur any where. There's no stationary place of "being stuck." Anywhere she goes and virtually anything she does pertinent to any given natural mother who's the target and object of this cruel oppressiveness in her adoption-related child-loss situation her persecutors are able to locate and further thwart her. So any given natural mother can be "stuck" is any where.
The why of making any given child-less mother who is so because her child[ren] was/were taken and adopted out away from her and so making her "stuck"--and consequently stopping her from progressing past her adoption-related trials--is best explained thus. These actions against her are imposed upon her to discredit her.
Criminalizing and afflicting these natural mothers, and so making them "stuck" with criminality (having a criminal record) and also afflicting them with mental health problems, more than anything is to stop them from progressing to upward mobility. If she's discredited and so made to look like a loser as if she wasn't of sound mind after the fact of her child[ren] being taken from her so is the attitude--of those who thwart her after they took/take her child[ren] and adopt[ed] him, her, or them out away from her--then her child[ren] won't want to know her.
It's really this simple. Nothing too complex about this.
Natural mothers then are not "stuck." Instead we're thwarted and oppressed.
The who of childless mothers being stuck who speciffically are those mothers of adoption-loss who lost [a] child[ren] because their child[reb] was/were removed from their custody and adopted out away--from them--are that the lawyers and social workers along with others who in turn took custody of these mothers' children are the ones responsible for said mothers being stuck. In other words these mothers in many cases are stopped from making progress in their lives after the fact despite being assured by those who took their child[ren] they, the now child-less mother, could advance their lives accordingly.
Frequently lawyers like the one who led in my son being taken and adopted out away from me who was David McConkie and who helped "social worker" Colleen Burnham arrange my son's removal from my custody and placement and then proceeded to surveille me intrusively such that their encroachments into my personal affairs stopped me from going forward to affectuate improvements in my life other adoption practitioners also keep track of those natural mothers whose child[ren] they took/take and adopt out away from them. More specifically anyone whom ever took any given mother's child[ren] and adopted out her child[ren] away from her, which includes anyone whom the mother knows as the "facilitator" who took/takes her child[ren] and adopted out her child[ren] away from her, also can be identified as the tracker.
What happens which are some of the actions taken against these natural mothers, that result in her being stuck in her experience of her child[ren] being taken from her and adopted out away from her, number various tracking methods. Among these are wrongly using her identification numbers--driver's license, state ID card, date of birth information, Social Security number and those for military purposes as well as state entitlement account numbers--which could deprive the natural mother of opportunities. Education, housing, credit and employment denials constitute the deprivation such mothers could suffer because their identification numbers are used to defraud them. For some such mothers these unfavorable records against her can persist for years.
On my Experian/TRW credit report David McConkie falsified my education information by which he gave the appearance of me having defaulted on student loans, and also forged my work history on my Social Security records and so made me look like a fraudster. Then this corrupt lawyer circulated these counterfeits pretending he was part of efforts criminally investigating me.
Worsening this is that this same crooked lawyer wrongly used this forged information to steal keys to my residences and then trespassed them again pretending he and others were investigating me. As bad as this was it got even worse.
When any given adoption-related childless mother is mired down (stuck) in the ordeal of her
child[ren] being taken from her INvoluntarily and adopted out away from her, if in fact her situation hence is perverted thus, usually starts not long after she loses her child[ren]. In my case this oppressiveness was begun the first year during which my son was wrongly classified a "boarder-baby" and while the supposed adoption proceedings were being conducted in court. Other such mothers also may have similar testimony relative to their adoption-related losses.
Since identifying numbers are used to track natural mothers and make them "stuck" in their wrongful adopted-related situation this molestation can occur any where. There's no stationary place of "being stuck." Anywhere she goes and virtually anything she does pertinent to any given natural mother who's the target and object of this cruel oppressiveness in her adoption-related child-loss situation her persecutors are able to locate and further thwart her. So any given natural mother can be "stuck" is any where.
The why of making any given child-less mother who is so because her child[ren] was/were taken and adopted out away from her and so making her "stuck"--and consequently stopping her from progressing past her adoption-related trials--is best explained thus. These actions against her are imposed upon her to discredit her.
Criminalizing and afflicting these natural mothers, and so making them "stuck" with criminality (having a criminal record) and also afflicting them with mental health problems, more than anything is to stop them from progressing to upward mobility. If she's discredited and so made to look like a loser as if she wasn't of sound mind after the fact of her child[ren] being taken from her so is the attitude--of those who thwart her after they took/take her child[ren] and adopt[ed] him, her, or them out away from her--then her child[ren] won't want to know her.
It's really this simple. Nothing too complex about this.
Natural mothers then are not "stuck." Instead we're thwarted and oppressed.
Monday, February 9, 2009
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)